This past
Is now here: the
painter's
Reflected face, in
which we linger, receiving
Dreams and inspirations
on an unassigned
Frequency...
-John Ashbery, Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror, 1975
Update: I wrote a second piece on the film here.
Terrence Malick has always made movies through himself—his view of the world, and how his eyes connect to the experiences he sees and grapples with. There have been countless attempts to describe his perspective: the connections between man and nature, life and death, the one and the many. “All things shining” to use that final, elliptical line in The Thin Red Line. It almost feels like there is no point in attempting to articulate Malick anymore: even the closest descriptions often still fail to capture the opulence of his filmmaking. But the one person who hasn’t questioned or described Malick’s filmmaking and philosophy is Malick himself.
Terrence Malick has always made movies through himself—his view of the world, and how his eyes connect to the experiences he sees and grapples with. There have been countless attempts to describe his perspective: the connections between man and nature, life and death, the one and the many. “All things shining” to use that final, elliptical line in The Thin Red Line. It almost feels like there is no point in attempting to articulate Malick anymore: even the closest descriptions often still fail to capture the opulence of his filmmaking. But the one person who hasn’t questioned or described Malick’s filmmaking and philosophy is Malick himself.
The
often described as reclusive director—a statement that fails to see that his
“non-statements” are just as telling as those whose blabber appears on talk
shows and Twitter—has made a new film, coming to theaters under two years after
his massive project, The Tree of Life.
But To The Wonder, a title filled
with both richness and hidden meanings, is not an extension of that 2011 tone
poem of childhood nostalgia and cosmic grandeur, but instead almost its polar
opposite.
Malick
has often placed himself at the centers of his narrative: the one who speaks
for him: Holly, Linda, Witt, Jack, often speak for him. His films, thus, have been more or less about him
enforcing his philosophical perspective onto the worlds of his characters. The
tension released by this—often by imposing his style onto classic American
genres like lovers on the run, WW2 combat picture, and childhood melodrama—has
always released by Malick’s side “winning.” We give into his view than the one
we’re used to.
It
is essential then, that Malick’s own figure in To The Wonder is passive, lumbering, somewhat adrift—a heavy figure
nailed Neil, played by Ben Affleck. His muse, Marina, is the floating,
beautiful, and always reaching for the sky Olga Kurylenko. She’s the main
figure in the film—and certainly the Malickian figure. But she is not Malick.
Malick’s
films have always been set in the past, a place where he could retrospectively
comment on the action that had already been solidified in American mythology
and speak to how what was fundamentally American becomes universal. Even Badlands feels like a picture made in
the 1950s with Sheen as Dean and Hunter his reluctant sidekick. But To The Wonder, opening with the images
of phone cameras amongst a completely foreign landscape and later giving us the
alienating forces of laundromats and suburban ennui, suddenly breaks the
director into the shape of reality.
This is not a director finding “Wonder” in the images of contemporary
society, the “To” suggests that this wonder is beyond us, a force outside of his
images. And To The Wonder thus
becomes the director’s most self-conscious question of his own persona, his own
imagination. This is a film of self-doubt, of a search for faith in a world
that no longer supports the articulations of the past.
The opening set piece, a gorgeous cathedral on the coast of Normandy
amongst a black sand beach, gears us into the old world, the familiarity of
Malick. Even though that fast paced car and iPhones might suggest a future,
they are all placed within a consciousness of the old. Marina’s first word, “Newborn,” however, prepares the film
almost as a diary to the young, a story of how the old was replaced.
After the prelude in the old, the film jars us into the new, as Neil
convinces Marina and her daughter, Tatiana Chiline, to come to the plains of
Oklahoma. There is beauty to be found among the thistles of grass and the interaction
between clouds and sun, but immediately we see the power lines and planes that
watch over this space. They reach and dance toward the sky, but the freedom
once held foreshadows a quelling of openness.
Allow some theoretical guess making, at this moment, in order to read
into this film too much, but to come to a truth at the other side. I’ve been
told by rumors and comments that To The
Wonder is very much Malick’s most personal film, as in he notably had a
romance with a French woman, brought her to America, and was ultimately left
devastated by her. It’s hard to say when this took place, whether only a few
years ago or a few decades, but it did take place, and if he has made a film
about it, it certainly lingers in Malick’s mind.
This is why To The Wonder might
be Malick’s boldest, most audacious, and certainly most self-conscious film. It
is filmed through his eyes and perspective on the world, but not via a
character who represents himself. Instead, the film looks at himself through the eyes of another. Affleck
remains silent, barely able to speak, left to drift in the plains, as Malick
takes apart his own persona. This is not some delicate self-portrait of an
artist, but a scarring one filmed by the artist who is clearly in a crisis.
It is clear that something must have fundamentally changed Malick to make
a film so quickly, while simultaneously now shooting another handful of
features. The products of that change are massively evident in To The Wonder’s self-doubt. The modern
world continues to alienate these characters more and more: there’s the
occasional magic of lights of a carnival, the symmetries of a football marching
band, or the dances of the supermarket, but those images become more and more
jarring. The bigger houses become filled with more emptiness and distance, the
suburbia an anxiety-ridden landscape without originality, and finally two
moments that tear these characters apart: a sterile, soulless motel room, and
of all things, a Sonic Drive Thru, a moment so intense with feeling, made so
pale by the context of American consumerism. What was grand among the plains
now loses all of its romantic gesture.
Malick’s film is not just a question of these characters, but also the
relevance of his own style. What happens when his cameras can no longer capture
the beauty of the past, but are forced to deal with modern questions? I believe
Malick is searching for his own meaning to why he makes films, and tying it to
someone he once loved but ultimately ended up tearing her apart. Affleck’s
character builds homes amongst landscapes, containing and ultimately
simplifying nature into something packaged. In a way, To The Wonder thus responds to those who fell for Malick for the
images he shows instead of his perspective on them—this is a film in a battle
with its own perspective.
A director could never say that—especially one as silent as him—so it
instead manifests itself in a question of love. A self-doubting priest, played
by Javier Bardem, tells us about two types of love, both flowing from the “Love
that loves us.” Bardem’s love is of course the love of God, but his search in
the beginning of the film brings him only to the poor and sickly that do
everything to reject him. He is a priest who is tied to earthly matters, things
he can only doubt his purpose if everything he reaches out to pushes back.
In the same way, Marina and Neil wrestle with their love, the ties that
bind them together. At times their love seems over-flowing with trust,
expressing itself in romantic gestures of movement across bodies, a haunting
evocation that rarely requires dialogue. But while their bodies remained
intertwined, their consciousnesses are polarized: he looks toward the future,
while she searches for the past. He builds a new community and society, remaining
ignorant of the issues at stake to those around him, while she searches for a
feeling of harmony against the natural land, which is slowly disappearing. Even
a return to the world of the old, to Paris, suddenly becomes an electric blue
nightmare.
While Malcik has always
suggested the bonds of nature will tie us all together in a harmonious,
over-conscious state, the opposite is true here. There are no less then half a
dozen languages in the film (including sign language), all spoken toward each
other, communicated partially but never fully. There are at least three stories
of mothers who lose their daughters, women who lose their connection to the
future, forced to relish in a past they can never escape. A Skype call, left on
a twist, never felt so pained by the accidents of new technology. And the
constant battle between the modern and the natural, those creeping houses
turning what was a gorgeous landscape into something toxic (a shot of a small
blade of grass among a mountain of dirt, Malick’s last breath of fresh air).
Ultimately, the romances of both natural and human fail. Even Affleck’s
tryst with Rachel McAdams is doomed from the start. A cattle owner on a dying
farm, always chained by the boundaries her world has set up for her. She is to
remain a figure of the past as well, and her only shot with Kurylenko—a blink
and you’ll miss it moment that doubles down on the audaciousness of The Loneliest Planet—remains an
anonymous connection amongst the suburban pavement. Calling To The Wonder in a way Malcik’s most
cynical movie is certainly true at moments—its characters are destined to
wander the empty 21st century. A white veil becomes black, Marina
blocks the sun from her eyes, as if to reject the nature she put her faith
amongst. The images here have a violence to them in a way Malick has truly
never shown.
Yet there is the Love that loves. A priest slowly finds those who
need faith, watched closely by a man lost by his own actions. A man who tried
to strengthen the bonds, but in all the wrong places. Will he change? We see
his new home, a serenely structured waterfall, centers his backyard, a meshing
of natural and modern, finally balanced, like the way a mechanical device
captures light on a strip. Perhaps a new faith? Perhaps not. One man finds
solace; we must find out own.
And the woman? Off to the old.
Back to the spiral, the wonder. But alone. An image of the past, now as future.
Terrence Malick’s To The Wonder
is a masterpiece.
2 comments:
Great review!
What has changed in Malick's life is that the french woman he married in the eighties (and who inspired the character of Marina) died in 2008. I think that explains the crisis he seems to be going through in this film, and it makes it all even more powerful and sad...
Peter: Let me begin by being upfront in saying I'm especially skeptical of almost all criticism that tries to tie a director's work to his (or her) personal life.
Doing so suggests that the narrative we know about the director's life is accurate (as if public figures unselfishly expose their true selves to us), that they don't have secrets, and that they're as two-dimensional as the narratives about them tend to be.
Often, it also assumes that what directors say in tiresome press junkets is indeed heartfelt and true and not motivated by commercialism or the desire to come off as a deep/profound individual.
With that established, obviously I'm even more skeptical about attempts to tie autobiographical motivations to the work of Malick, a director everyone agrees we know very little about. (Even assuming that Malick has "often placed himself at the centers of his narrative" seems overly presumptive to me.)
Thus, this review, while possibly accurate, has an uncomfortable number of "clearly" and "certainly" readings within it, as it relates to Malick's motivation. (Most notably: Aren't you going pretty far out on the limb to say that Malick is "clearly in a crisis"?)
On that note, it's worth asking: If TO THE WONDER isn't Malick "most self-conscious" film, then is it still his "boldest" and "most audacious"? Put another way, much of your analysis that this film is a masterpiece seems to hang on the belief that it's vividly revelatory about Malick. But what if it isn't?
A few other notes ...
* I don't think Affleck's character builds houses. Indeed, he's frequently seen at new construction sites. But he seems to always be taking soil/water samples, and not always where there's construction. So that might affect your analysis of his character as a stand-in for Malick.
* Following the previous note, it seems flimsy to suggest Niel is fixated on the future and Marina is tied to the past.
I respect that in all of the above you're trying to express what you felt watching the movie, which seems to be heavily influenced by some assumptions about Malick's life and artistic motivations.
I very much respect that sincerity, I don't mean to shit on it. It's just that here you seem to be basing quite a bit of your analysis on assumptions of off-screen realities, which is unusual for your reviews.
Post a Comment