Pina
Directed By: Wim
Wenders
Featuring:
Members of the Tanztheater Wuppertal
Director of Photography: Helene Louvart, Editor: Toni
Froschhammer, Production Designer: Peter Pabst, Original Music: Thom Hanreich
Rated: PG for
dancing, I assume.
Now
two years into the “three dimensional revolution,” the style has finally
arrived in its most luscious and perfected use in Pina, a dance documentary from Wim Wenders, featuring the
choreography of Pina Bausch. 3D became the next step in cinema after James
Cameron’s Avatar, but since then,
directors have struggled to find an art in creation space and depth, while
studios have thrown it on top of films without any care for what use of 3D
should be. Even skillful directors like Werner Herzog (Cave of Forgotten Dreams), Martin Scorsese (Hugo), and Steven Spielberg (The Adventures of Tintin) haven’t particularly cracked the 3D bubble in a way
that occasionally wows but often remains flat. What exactly are we supposed to
do with all this space?
But
Mr. Wenders, who has made a name both as a director of narratives (Wings of Desire) and concert
documentaries (The Buena Vista Social
Club), understands why 3D should be used: complete spectacle. The same
could be said for the choreography of the late Ms. Bausch, whose choreography
defies most structures of what we understand as dance—breaking our
understanding of tradition for something new and inventive. And thus, the
marriage of the two artists—Ms. Bauch as the creator and Mr. Wenders as the
capturer—makes for pure magic in this total extravaganza.
As
someone who has watched only a few ballets, modern dance was more or less alien
to me as I sat down with my 3D glasses sitting awkwardly on my face. And
describing what Ms. Bausch does is somewhat difficult. The dancers don’t as
much move as much as they live. They’re performances, as they move around
chairs, or attempt to fall in love, or grive in a corner, less choreographed
motion than organic performance. Mr. Wenders smartly takes his camera out of
the audience and onto the stage, allowing us to see the not just the physical
performance, but the facial performance is detailed as well.
But
it is more the inventiveness of the set pieces by Ms. Bausch than the camera
work of Mr. Wenders that shines. Dancers fly through the air elated with joy.
They pound the ground, as if screaming for release. Lovers support each other
from collapsing to the ground. Mr. Wenders smartly relieves himself of the
theatrical space for a number of the works, taking them out into the world and
making them part of life, refusing the divorce us from the world they inhabit.
And along with the excellent score and soundtrack, the work hooks you in as you
try to understand the wonder.
Pina, as described earlier, is also the
first film to understand why spectacle is the only appropriate use of 3D. The
more breathtaking sequences often feature dancers arms and legs flying in and
out of the screen. One dancer often explodes from the screen, while others fall
behind in the space. This effect does return Pina to some of its theatricality, but it also gives you a sense of
“wow” that few filmmakers can do when using the somewhat puzzling format.
Pina loves that sense of wonderment, of
showing you something that disregards explanation, much less any sense of logical
cohesion. It’s a shame that Mr. Wenders decided to include a number of
interviews with the dancers of Ms. Bausch’s troupe, each one explaining why the
choreographer was so legendary. Explanation is certainly not necessary; it’s
all in the movements of their bodies.
No comments:
Post a Comment