Young and naive Adam (Alex Pettyfer) sits on a couch, pumped
up from adrenaline from the experience he just had. On a complete whim, he has
does stripped down to almost his bare ass for a loud of screaming young women.
He was awkward and a bit silly, unsure of what to do, which made his so-called
“performance” all the more exciting for the crowd. He sits on a couch while the
rest of his now-colleagues celebrate and joke around for another successful
night. Still dressed in only underwear, dollars are flowing out of his pants,
as if his cock was spewing it. His body has a value, and we can see it right
there.
How does one make a film about a digital economy, about a
series of abstract relations that do not exist? Soderbergh’s Body Capital
trilogy does not even try and make a film about how we can see and experience
digital abstraction, but instead turns toward the physical—the body. His three
films—The Girlfriend Experience, Haywire, and Magic Mike—speak directly a series of characters who use and
exploit their own physical attributes for capital gain, and the toil it takes
on their bodies and psychology.
Chris cannot actually change the physical bodies of his clients;
his job is only to give the confidence
of doing so—they must change their bodies themselves. Soderbergh juxtaposes
Chris’s sessions with Chelsea’s dates, as his supposed “friendships” are just
as artificial as Chelsea’s dates.
The film’s narration is one of its crucial links—we see the
appointments and feel the emotions that might be present, but then Chelsea
reduces these interactions down to essential data points (“I wore a black
cashmere sweater…he talked the entire time. We didn’t have sex.”).
Everything is a business transaction—the film both opens and
ends with clients telling Chelsea to invest in gold, a tangible reality that
gives clients something to hold onto, which is the film’s final image—two
bodies embracing something physical, not actual reality, but the tangible
qualities of being alive.
The world seems to be a daze of beach parties, amusement
parks, jumping off bridges, and the daily rituals of audience titillation, but
Soderbergh’s frames have a disinterested look to them, viewing it all as
“passing time.” When Mike is asked about his furniture business, he claims,
“The market hasn’t really hit the sweet spot yet” biding his time (one of the film’s
many wonderful details—a logo for Mike’s Mobile Detailing lines his truck,
another dream deferred).
The film’s plot is at one point repeated as a series of data
points of names and locations by Mallory’s one-man audience whom she takes
hostage to start the film: “Jamie, Victor, Rodrigo…Barcelona…” “Hostage name”
“Jang.” At one point, Haywire is the
kind of stripped down action film uninterested in particulars and their
connections to each other, but at another, it almost sees this all as “just
business.”
When Fassbender's Paul claims he’s never had to kill a
woman, Kenneth retorts, “Oh, you shouldn't think of her as being a woman. No,
that would be a mistake.” The tactile qualities of gender only matter in
certain parts of Haywire, only as a
valuable asset. Mallory protests to the Dublin mission of simply being “eye
candy,” which is the only reason to even cast her in that role. While The Girlfriend Experience emphasizes
gender, Magic Mike and Haywire subvert their naturally
singularized professions to other genders, once again exposing this
relationship between the performative nature of the body and the monetary value
that can be derived from those physical actions.
His films view the image as a static realm—a pure moment. Just
look at his colors: the blue hues the hollow the spaceship in Solaris, the heated, saturated yellows
that define Tampa in Magic Mike. The
bodies of his characters seems to exist somewhere between space and not
space—foregrounds and backgrounds are flattened, so characters move through
less of a reality than an environment.
The whole scandal and the character seems so silly and minor
you begin to wonder why the hell is
Soderbergh making this movie?, as funny as some of his misadventures are.
But then you begin to notice details in the voiceover. Why is Whitacare going
on about the secret trade skills of polar bears or the number of syllables for
words in the German language? There’s so much information—a deluge of data—that we aren’t able to process what it all really
means.
Like his other two films with Burns, the windows in The Informant! are almost blindingly
white, as if nothing exists beyond the space the image has framed.
Soderbergh has been unfairly described as unemotional
director, but that description fits Contagion’s
clinical edge: the film is always teetering between its own obsessed paranoia
and the rationality needed to combat it. When Kate Winslet realizes she herself
has the virus and is going to die, she doesn’t panic. She calls the hotel staff
and tells them all they need to do to prepare the rest of the soon-to-be dead.
Soderbergh shoots the entire sequence in long shots with an intensely blue
palette and rough hard edges. We finally get a close-up as Winslet’s dead body
is taken in, the flakes of her skin falling off her body. There’s nothing
pretty or sympathetic about it.
For 45 minutes, Soderbergh and Burns put us in the
predicament of Emily—a girl who just wants to be normal, but is assaulted
throughout by the language and rhetoric of the businesses of psychiatry and
pharmaceuticals. Her hair slowly loses its color, and more than any other film,
Soderbergh completely isolates the visual space of her character into a flat
reality of which she can’t escape. References to Polanski, Hitchcock, and
Michael Powell’s Peeping Tom make us
deeply sympathetic to the plight of a girl in a system that constantly tries to
fix her—Banks’s motto is that Americans go to psychiatrists “to get better.”
Side Effects
exists in a 21st century landscape where it’s not about the mystery,
but putting the elements in the right order. Burns’s plots are almost
reflective of Wikipedia articles—there’s too much information, too many
details, and it’s all unstructured till its too late. We never realize that
we’re just buying into the narratives we’re being told to buy into.
No comments:
Post a Comment