![]() |
| Photo of 2013? |
Showing posts with label michael haneke. Show all posts
Showing posts with label michael haneke. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
More Amour!
Friday, October 12, 2012
NYFF: Like Someone In A Panic Attack
While the above frame might suggest something creepy, there is nothing plot wise unsettling in the latest from Abbas Kiarostami, a Tokyo-set drama entitled Like Someone In Love. Since I've praised Certified Copy to the high heavens, I didn't like this as much, but found my visceral reaction to it (shaking, convulsing) to be one of the most unique reactions I've had in a movie all year.
Anyways, it's one of four movies discussed in this week's Cinephiliacs, along with Michael Haneke's Amour, Leos Carax's Holy Motors, and Olivier Assayas's Something in the Air. And I'm glad to take David Ehrlich from the Criterion Corner along for the ride to discuss them. Listen to that here.
Additionally, I wrote a piece for Criticwire discussing further thoughts on the Kiarostami film as well as Downpour, one of the Masterworks films and an early landmark piece of Iranian cinema from a director named Bahram Beyza’i. Beyza'i is one of those directors who everyone in Tehran knows really well, mainly for his theater work, but now I can't wait to see more of his films. Anyways, read that piece here.
Anyways, it's one of four movies discussed in this week's Cinephiliacs, along with Michael Haneke's Amour, Leos Carax's Holy Motors, and Olivier Assayas's Something in the Air. And I'm glad to take David Ehrlich from the Criterion Corner along for the ride to discuss them. Listen to that here.
Additionally, I wrote a piece for Criticwire discussing further thoughts on the Kiarostami film as well as Downpour, one of the Masterworks films and an early landmark piece of Iranian cinema from a director named Bahram Beyza’i. Beyza'i is one of those directors who everyone in Tehran knows really well, mainly for his theater work, but now I can't wait to see more of his films. Anyways, read that piece here.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Michael: Pedophelia and Its Discontents
Michael
Written and Directed
By: Markus Schleinzer
Starring: Michael
Fuith and David Rauchenberger
Director of Photography: Gerard Kerkletz, Editor: Wolfgang
Widerhofer, Production Designer: Katrin Huber, Original Music: Lorenz Dangel
Rated: Unrated,
but the subject matter should be a clear warning.
Meet
Michael. He’s in his mid-30s. He sports a pair of glasses and is starting to
bald. He works at an insurance company and he’s in line for a promotion. He
visits his sisters, calls his mother. He a substantial though modest home and a
car to match it. He also has a young child locked in his basement, and
occasionally rapes him.
And
that’s the conceit of Michael, an
early starter for the most pointless film of the year in the art house
spectrum. The film comes from the mind of Austrian director Markus Schleinzer,
who worked as a casting director for Michael Haneke. It’s easy to see the
influence, but the limitations of someone who is not Michael Haneke. The camera
is stiff and unflinching, though letting the imagination often creating the
horrors that we truly fear. But it’s not as rigorous, and the subject matter of
pedophilia is presented without anything of note, besides the point, “Evil is
banal.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


